I was having
trouble understanding the truth part because how can a CNF writer have so many
true stories that can meet the creative side of the nonfiction? How can we go
beyond documents and interviews and incorporate the creative part without
jeopardizing the nonfiction and keeping it truth all the way? Well, this
cleared up to me when in the article by Gutkind it was said that “there are no
rules, laws, specific prescriptions relating to what to do and not to do as a
creative nonfiction writer.” After all, the “creative nonfiction police is
ourselves.”
In addition,
Lott said that we won’t know CNF all the way until we experience it. The
learning of this definition is through experience. The following help
understand even more what is important to keep in mind about the definition of
CNF:
- 1st : “Strive for the truth” – we may not remember the true events accurately to a hundred percent but as a writer we should try to stick to the truth as best as we can remember without making anything up.
- 2nd: “Recognize the important distinction between recollected conversation and fabricated dialogue.”- we need to make sure that as we write we don’t add to the dialogue, if we can’t remember how things were said then we should assumed what was said our make up what was said.
- 3rd: “Don’t round corners” – we can’t adjust the story to make it more dramatic, we should stick to what we originally remember as best possible.
- 4th: - Allow your characters to read what you wrote about them. Writing CNF means that you will be using characters whom are real people, we should at least let them know we are writing about them.
What was
left out – Although all the definitions read are helpful
and complete I feel like they left out the explanation about how can we
maintain the privacy of our characters? What if our characters don’t what us to
use their real names? Would this still be CNF, or would it make it Fiction
because their names are not real? Would this be unethical?
Also, in the
reading by Gutkind he mentioned that someone question him about how can he
possibly remember something that occurred months ago accurately. So, is there a
limit in time when you have to write your story down, like if your story
occurred years ago, can you still write about it and make it CNF. Are you
running the risk that this would have more fiction unintentionally because it
occurred too long ago? What are the thoughts about this, if any?
How are
definitions of creative nonfiction changing in light of digital publishing? – Well, in
today’s technology we can pretty much write on anything whenever we can or
want. We can post something on any of our social media accounts or any web base
surface. These, including perhaps small pieces created by immature writers,
writers wanting to open themselves to the public in a less formal way.
Writing in the digital world is more open, I think. You can basically
post anything without having someone tell you that your piece is not worth
publishing. I think that the definition of CNF still goes right along with the
digital publishing, unless while writing digitally the writer decides to change
things a bit, making it fiction. I think that people do CNF writing many times
in the digital world through their social media accounts unintentionally. Many
times you’ll find people writing small paragraphs about their feeling or how
they truly feel about something that occurred to them. Even if you are the only
judge of what you write, because only you know whether what you wrote is true
or not, as long as is true, even in the digital world it is still CNF.
No comments:
Post a Comment